I will continue to adamantly oppose any unnecessary cost-shifting by USDA to the states.
Continue to oppose unnecessary USDA cost-shifting to states.
Occurrences
Evidence
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
The June 5, 2026 press release says Rep. Grijalva introduced amendments to address the harmful SNAP state cost-shift, describing it as driving Arizonans off food assistance.
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
Grijalva announced two FY2027 Agriculture Appropriations amendments addressing SNAP state cost-shift impacts, said she would continue to oppose unnecessary USDA cost-shifting to states, and noted the amendments were not accepted in the final House Republican bill.
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
USDA FNA extended the comment period from August 24, 2026, to September 8, 2026, on a proposed rule to reduce the federal share of annual SNAP state administrative costs from 50 percent to 25 percent beginning in fiscal year 2027.
Assessments
The promise was to continue opposing USDA cost-shifting to states, not necessarily to fully block or reverse the policy. In federal office, Grijalva took same-term legislative action by introducing FY2027 Agriculture Appropriations amendments addressing the SNAP administrative cost-shift and publicly opposing the USDA proposal. Although the amendments were not adopted and the USDA rule remained pending, those facts show the underlying policy fight was unresolved, not that she failed to continue opposition.
Grijalva publicly opposed the USDA/SNAP state cost-shift in her current term and introduced amendments aimed at stopping it, which directly matches the pledge to continue opposing that policy.