Senator Cornyn’s take? It’s time for payback. That’s why Senator Cornyn has demanded that the federal government reimburse the Lone Star State for every penny spent doing the federal government’s job.
Seek federal reimbursement to Texas for all state funds spent on border security work the federal government should have performed.
Occurrences
Evidence
Texas Governor Greg Abbott asked Congress and the Texas delegation to reimburse more than $11.1 billion in Texas taxpayer border-security spending.
Cornyn said he would fight to include reimbursement funds in Congress's reconciliation legislation for Texas's border-security costs.
Congress.gov lists Sen. John Cornyn as sponsor of S.1790, introduced May 15, 2025, with Sen. Ted Cruz as cosponsor.
Public Law 119-21 created a State Border Security Reinforcement Fund with $10 billion and a DOJ reimbursement fund up to $3.5 billion.
The Senate roll-call page shows H.R. 1 passed on July 1, 2025, and Cornyn voted Yea.
Assessments
Public Law 119-21 (enacted July 2025) established a State Border Security Reinforcement Fund ($10 billion) plus a DOJ reimbursement fund (up to $3.5 billion), creating federal reimbursement mechanisms that in aggregate are sufficient to cover Texas's $11.1 billion reimbursement request. Cornyn materially advanced the outcome: he sponsored S.1790 to create reimbursement funds, publicly pushed for inclusion of reimbursement in reconciliation, and voted Yea on the reconciliation bill (H.R.1) that became Public Law 119-21. The statute reimburses eligible post–Jan 20, 2021 state border-security expenses and is not an exclusive Texas earmark, but it accomplishes the pledged federal reimbursement. These actions and the law's enactment occurred while Cornyn remained in office, so the promise is fulfilled in the same term.
Cornyn took concrete action by sponsoring S.1790 to create reimbursement funds and voting for H.R. 1, which became Public Law 119-21. That law established federal border-security reimbursement mechanisms totaling up to $13.5 billion for eligible state expenses, enough in aggregate to cover Texas's stated $11.1 billion request, even though the funds were not an exclusive Texas earmark. Because the promise was to seek reimbursement and the reimbursement mechanism was enacted during the same Senate term, the promise is best classified as delivered.