Continue opposing funding for ICE until the agency is required to follow the same rules as other local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies.

Rick Larsen · Washington · Democratic

policy impact 0.80 specificity 0.91 extraction confidence 99%

Contest this claim

Occurrences

I voted no on this partisan bill to fund ICE, and I will continue to oppose funding ICE until the agency is required to follow the same rules as every other local, state and federal law enforcement agency.

Larsen commits to keep opposing ICE funding unless ICE is brought under the same rules as other law enforcement agencies.

Latest News | U.S. Representative Rick Larsen
primary · press_release · model gpt-5.4-mini

I voted no on this partisan bill to fund ICE, and I will continue to oppose funding ICE until the agency is required to follow the same rules as every other local, state and federal law enforcement agency.

Larsen commits to keep opposing ICE funding until the agency accepts the same rules as other law enforcement agencies.

News List | U.S. Representative Rick Larsen
primary · other · model gpt-5.4-mini

I voted no on this partisan bill to fund ICE, and I will continue to oppose funding ICE until the agency is required to follow the same rules as other local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies.

Commits to keep opposing ICE funding until ICE follows the same rules as other law enforcement agencies.

U.S. Representative Rick Larsen
primary · other · model gpt-5.4-mini

I voted no on this partisan bill to fund ICE, and I will continue to oppose funding ICE until the agency is required to follow the same rules as every other local, state and federal law enforcement agency.

Larsen said he will continue opposing ICE funding until ICE is subject to the same rules as other law enforcement agencies.

Larsen Votes No on Funding ICE without Guardrails | U.S. Representative Rick Larsen
primary · press_release · model gpt-5.5

Evidence

Larsen's office says he voted no on a partisan ICE funding bill, continued his condition that ICE follow ordinary law-enforcement rules, and proposed six amendments redirecting or striking ICE-related funding. It also says the House passed the bill 214-212 and Republicans blocked all of his amendments.

Within the 2026-06-07 to 2026-07-06 lookback window, Larsen took a concrete opposing vote on ICE funding without guardrails and attempted amendments to move funds away from ICE-related purposes. This directly matches the commitment to keep opposing ICE funding absent accountability rules.

delivered same_term A for effort

Larsen Votes No on Funding ICE without Guardrails | U.S. Representative Rick Larsen
primary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 98%

Contest this evidence item

Larsen's office says he voted for bipartisan DHS legislation funding every DHS agency except ICE and CBP, and voted against a FY2026 budget resolution starting negotiations for ICE and CBP funding. The statement says he would keep opposing full-year ICE and CBP funding until agents follow the same rules as other law enforcement agencies.

This shows Larsen separated non-ICE DHS funding from ICE/CBP funding, supported the former, and opposed the latter unless accountability conditions were met.

delivered same_term A for effort

Larsen Demands ICE Accountability; Votes to Fund FEMA, U.S. Coast Guard, TSA
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 96%

Contest this evidence item

Larsen's office says he cosponsored legislation to fully fund FEMA, Coast Guard, TSA, and other DHS agencies while excluding ICE, CBP, and the DHS Secretary's office. The release states he would not vote to fund ICE unless DHS agents follow ordinary law-enforcement rules.

This is an earlier same-term concrete action: cosponsoring an alternative DHS funding bill designed to keep non-ICE operations funded while withholding ICE/CBP funding pending reforms.

delivered same_term A for effort

Larsen Fights to Fund FEMA, U.S. Coast Guard, TSA; Hold ICE Accountable
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 95%

Contest this evidence item

The draft DHS appropriations bill linked from Larsen's cosponsorship release bars transfers to any account of U.S. Customs and Border Protection or U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and says CBP and ICE explanatory-statement amounts have no force or effect for the Act.

The underlying bill text supports Larsen's stated approach: fund other DHS functions while preventing funds from being transferred to ICE or CBP.

delivered same_term A for effort

Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2026 draft text
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 92%

Contest this evidence item

Assessments

delivered same_term A for effort

The promise was a continuing conduct commitment: oppose ICE funding unless ICE is required to follow ordinary law-enforcement rules. In the same federal House term, Larsen voted against ICE/CBP funding without guardrails on June 9-10, 2026, publicly reiterated the same condition, proposed amendments to strike or redirect ICE-related funding, voted for DHS funding that excluded ICE and CBP on April 30, 2026, and cosponsored an alternative DHS funding approach excluding ICE/CBP transfers. The broader ICE funding bill passed over his opposition and his amendments were blocked, but the promised action was continued opposition, not enactment of the accountability requirement itself.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 97%