prohibit taxpayer dollars from going to large scale ICE operations
Prohibit taxpayer dollars from being used for large-scale ICE operations.
Occurrences
Evidence
Andy Kim joined New Jersey officials and protesters at Delaney Hall, said ICE could not be allowed to keep operating that way, and called for the facility to be shut down.
A revised Secure America Act advanced on a 53-46 party-line Senate vote, and the text still authorized about $70 billion for immigration enforcement agencies including ICE.
President Trump signed the Secure America Act, which locks in $38 billion for ICE and keeps that funding in place through September 2029.
Congress.gov lists H.R.1 as Public Law No. 119-21 and summarizes that it provides $45 billion through FY2029 to ICE for detention capacity and over $29 billion through FY2029 for ICE hiring, transportation, removal operations, facilities, fleet, and 287(g) agreements.
The enacted text appropriates $45,000,000,000 to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement for detention capacity through September 30, 2029, and $29,850,000,000 for ICE hiring, enforcement, removal transportation, facilities, fleet modernization, family detention, and 287(g) agreements.
The Senate roll call for final passage of H.R.1 shows the bill passed 50-50 with the vice president voting yea; Andy Kim of New Jersey is recorded as voting Nay.
The Guardian reported that Trump signed the Secure America Act, a nearly $70 billion immigration enforcement package that funded ICE and border patrol activities through the rest of his presidency, including $38 billion for ICE through September 2029.
The Guardian reported that the House approved a $70 billion bill funding agencies leading Trump's immigration crackdown through September 2029, with $38 billion allocated to ICE and all Democrats voting no.
The Guardian reported that Kim visited Delaney Hall, tried to de-escalate a confrontation with ICE, was pepper-sprayed, called the facility a failure, and said it should be shut down.
In an interview, Kim said Congress was gathering to enable Delaney Hall-type enforcement through legislation, said he wanted to stop it, and criticized plans to flood ICE with tens of billions more taxpayer dollars.
Assessments
The promised outcome was not delivered. During Kim's federal term, Congress enacted Public Law 119-21, which appropriated tens of billions of taxpayer dollars for ICE detention capacity, hiring, enforcement, removals, facilities, fleet modernization, family detention, and 287(g) agreements through FY2029. That is the opposite of prohibiting taxpayer dollars for large-scale ICE operations. Kim voted Nay and publicly opposed expanded ICE funding and enforcement, so he receives effort credit, but the policy outcome failed.
The promised outcome was to prohibit federal taxpayer funding for large-scale ICE operations. Instead, during Kim's current federal term, Congress and the president moved in the opposite direction by enacting a major package that preserves and expands ICE funding through September 2029. The evidence does show Kim publicly opposing ICE operations and calling for a detention facility shutdown, but that is not the same as delivering a federal prohibition on funding, and the record here does not show a serious successful or near-successful legislative effort by him to impose that prohibition. Under federal candidate-credit standards, this is a failed promise rather than a delivered or partial one.