Prohibit taxpayer dollars from being used for large-scale ICE operations.

Andy Kim · New Jersey · Democratic

policy impact 0.75 specificity 0.86 extraction confidence 94%

Contest this claim

Occurrences

Evidence

Andy Kim joined New Jersey officials and protesters at Delaney Hall, said ICE could not be allowed to keep operating that way, and called for the facility to be shut down.

Shows Kim taking a concrete anti-ICE action during the lookback window, but it did not produce the broader policy prohibition he promised.

unresolved same_term A for effort

Protesters clash with ICE agents outside New Jersey detention center
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 78%

Contest this evidence item

A revised Secure America Act advanced on a 53-46 party-line Senate vote, and the text still authorized about $70 billion for immigration enforcement agencies including ICE.

The congressional direction in the lookback window moved toward more ICE funding, the opposite of prohibiting taxpayer dollars for large-scale ICE operations.

never same_term

Senate Republicans drop plans for $1bn to fund security at Trump's ballroom
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 91%

Contest this evidence item

President Trump signed the Secure America Act, which locks in $38 billion for ICE and keeps that funding in place through September 2029.

This is the clearest same-term evidence against the promise: instead of restricting ICE spending, a large federal funding package for ICE became law.

never same_term

Trump signs $70bn immigration act ensuring ICE funding through 2029
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 97%

Contest this evidence item

Congress.gov lists H.R.1 as Public Law No. 119-21 and summarizes that it provides $45 billion through FY2029 to ICE for detention capacity and over $29 billion through FY2029 for ICE hiring, transportation, removal operations, facilities, fleet, and 287(g) agreements.

Instead of prohibiting taxpayer funding for large-scale ICE operations, Congress enacted a law funding ICE detention and enforcement operations at very large scale through FY2029.

never same_term

H.R.1 - 119th Congress: An act to provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of H. Con. Res. 14 - Congress.gov
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 98%

Contest this evidence item

The enacted text appropriates $45,000,000,000 to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement for detention capacity through September 30, 2029, and $29,850,000,000 for ICE hiring, enforcement, removal transportation, facilities, fleet modernization, family detention, and 287(g) agreements.

The statutory text directly contradicts the promised prohibition by appropriating tens of billions of taxpayer dollars to ICE detention and removal infrastructure.

never same_term

Public Law 119-21, July 4, 2025
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 99%

Contest this evidence item

The Senate roll call for final passage of H.R.1 shows the bill passed 50-50 with the vice president voting yea; Andy Kim of New Jersey is recorded as voting Nay.

Kim voted against the large ICE-funding reconciliation bill, which is concrete opposition, but the bill still passed and became law.

never same_term A for effort

U.S. Senate Roll Call Vote 119th Congress, Vote 372
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 97%

Contest this evidence item

The Guardian reported that Trump signed the Secure America Act, a nearly $70 billion immigration enforcement package that funded ICE and border patrol activities through the rest of his presidency, including $38 billion for ICE through September 2029.

Later same-term reporting indicates federal policy moved further toward funding ICE operations, not prohibiting taxpayer support for them.

never same_term

Trump signs $70bn immigration act ensuring ICE funding through 2029
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 90%

Contest this evidence item

The Guardian reported that the House approved a $70 billion bill funding agencies leading Trump's immigration crackdown through September 2029, with $38 billion allocated to ICE and all Democrats voting no.

This shows the legislative outcome was expanded ICE funding despite Democratic opposition, not a taxpayer-funding prohibition.

never same_term

House Republicans approve $70bn bill for Trump's immigration crackdown
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 88%

Contest this evidence item

The Guardian reported that Kim visited Delaney Hall, tried to de-escalate a confrontation with ICE, was pepper-sprayed, called the facility a failure, and said it should be shut down.

Kim took visible oversight and protest-related action against an ICE detention facility, but this did not enact a federal bar on taxpayer funding for large-scale ICE operations.

unresolved same_term A for effort

US senator says he was pepper-sprayed by federal agents during protest at ICE facility
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 78%

Contest this evidence item

In an interview, Kim said Congress was gathering to enable Delaney Hall-type enforcement through legislation, said he wanted to stop it, and criticized plans to flood ICE with tens of billions more taxpayer dollars.

Kim publicly opposed additional ICE funding and enforcement expansion, but the evidence describes an effort to stop funding, not a delivered funding prohibition.

unresolved same_term A for effort

Andy Kim Wants Delaney Hall to Outrage You
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 80%

Contest this evidence item

Assessments

never same_term A for effort

The promised outcome was not delivered. During Kim's federal term, Congress enacted Public Law 119-21, which appropriated tens of billions of taxpayer dollars for ICE detention capacity, hiring, enforcement, removals, facilities, fleet modernization, family detention, and 287(g) agreements through FY2029. That is the opposite of prohibiting taxpayer dollars for large-scale ICE operations. Kim voted Nay and publicly opposed expanded ICE funding and enforcement, so he receives effort credit, but the policy outcome failed.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 97%

never same_term

The promised outcome was to prohibit federal taxpayer funding for large-scale ICE operations. Instead, during Kim's current federal term, Congress and the president moved in the opposite direction by enacting a major package that preserves and expands ICE funding through September 2029. The evidence does show Kim publicly opposing ICE operations and calling for a detention facility shutdown, but that is not the same as delivering a federal prohibition on funding, and the record here does not show a serious successful or near-successful legislative effort by him to impose that prohibition. Under federal candidate-credit standards, this is a failed promise rather than a delivered or partial one.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.4 · confidence 93%