Taxpayer Protection Pledge: no new taxes.
James Lankford will oppose any new tax increases.
Occurrences
Evidence
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
Question: On Passage of the Bill (H.R. 1, as Amended); Lankford (R-OK), Yea.
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
It includes a 1% tax on remittances, and a tax hike on investment income from college endowments.
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
CBO states that the federal excise tax base was expanded by new taxes, including that "a tax on certain remittance transfers started in 2026," and says CBO's February 2026 baseline reflected revenue from the "new excise tax on remittance transfers" included in Public Law 119-21.
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
The Senate roll call for H.R. 1 shows the question was "On Passage of the Bill," the result was "Bill Passed," and James Lankford (R-OK) voted "Yea."
Assessments
The promise was absolute: Lankford would oppose any new tax increases. During his same Senate term, he voted Yea on final passage of H.R. 1, which became Public Law 119-21. The evidence indicates that law created new federal taxes, including a new excise tax on certain remittance transfers and higher taxes on some college endowment investment income. Because he supported enactment of a bill containing new tax increases, the promise was not fulfilled. This was not a failed anti-tax effort; it was a vote inconsistent with the pledged opposition, so no effort badge is warranted.
The promise was absolute: oppose any new tax increases. In the 119th Congress, James Lankford voted for final passage of H.R. 1, which became Public Law 119-21 and included at least two new federal tax increases, including a 1% tax on remittances and a higher tax on certain college endowment investment income. Supporting a bill that enacted new taxes conflicts directly with the promise to oppose any new tax increases.