underscores the need for Congress to pass her bill giving the D.C. mayor control of the Guard
Congress must pass my bill giving the D.C. mayor control of the Guard.
Occurrences
Evidence
The D.C. National Guard and Joint Task Force-District of Columbia carry that legacy forward every day, supporting interagency partners and public safety.
At the request of the Mayor of the District of Columbia and at the approval of the Secretary of the Army, the D.C. National Guard forms the Joint Task Force.
The Council has no greater authority over the National Guard of the District of Columbia than was vested in the Commissioner before January 2, 1975.
Sponsor: Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large] (Introduced 02/01/2021). Latest Action: House - 02/01/2021 Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Reform. This bill has the status Introduced.
To extend to the Mayor of the District of Columbia the same authority over the National Guard of the District of Columbia as the Governors of the several States exercise over the National Guard of those States with respect to administration of the National Guard.
The President of the United States shall be the Commander-in-Chief of the militia of the District of Columbia.
Nothing in this chapter shall be construed as vesting in the District government any greater authority over the National Guard of the District of Columbia... than was vested in the Commissioner prior to January 2, 1975.
The Secretary of Defense... is authorized and directed to supervise, administer and control the Army National Guard and the Air National Guard of the District of Columbia... Through the Commanding General, the Secretary of Defense shall command the military operations.
At the request of the Mayor of the District of Columbia and at the approval of the Secretary of the Army, the D.C. National Guard forms the Joint Task Force to support both federal and local law enforcement, emergency response and emergency management agencies.
Assessments
Norton introduced H.R.657, the District of Columbia National Guard Home Rule Act, which directly matched the promise by seeking to give the D.C. mayor authority comparable to state governors over the National Guard. But the bill was only introduced and referred to committee in the 117th Congress and did not pass. Current law and official DC National Guard materials still place control with federal officials, with mayoral requests subject to federal approval. This was a serious legislative attempt, but the promised outcome has not been delivered.
Norton's promise depended on Congress enacting her bill to transfer control of the D.C. National Guard to the mayor. The cited D.C. code still withholds greater local authority over the Guard, and current official Guard materials continue to describe mayoral requests as subject to federal approval rather than mayoral control. That means the promised outcome was not delivered. Because the claim expressly refers to 'my bill,' Norton appears to have made a serious legislative effort, but the policy change still did not occur.