Remove chemical company liability protections and preemption of state and local pesticide warning-label and usage rules from the Farm Bill.

Chellie Pingree · Maine · Democratic

policy impact 0.78 specificity 0.92 extraction confidence 96%

Commitment kind: unknown. Promised action: not established. Promised outcome: not established. Deadline: unknown; not assumed expired.

Contest this claim

Occurrences

Evidence

unverified · Source version 1845 · locator unknown

Pingree said she led the effort to strip pesticide preemption language from the appropriations bill and warned the issue could return in the Farm Bill.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Pingree took concrete action to remove the pesticide liability/preemption rider, but the fight was not finished and could reappear in farm-bill negotiations.

unresolved same_term A for effort

Pesticide industry ‘immunity shield’ stripped from US appropriations bill
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 78%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 30797 · locator unknown

Section 10205 imposes national uniformity for pesticide labeling and blocks states, localities, and courts from adding different labeling or warning requirements; Section 10206 bars local regulation of pesticide sale, distribution, labeling, application, or use.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The House farm bill text still contains the pesticide-label uniformity and preemption language the commitment sought to remove.

unresolved same_term

H.R. 7567 - Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 97%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 1846 · locator unknown

Congress.gov lists the bill status as Introduced, with latest House action being referral to the House Committee on Agriculture on 2026-02-13.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): As of the official bill page, H.R. 7567 had not advanced beyond introduction/referral, so the requested change had not been enacted.

unresolved same_term

All Info - H.R. 7567 - Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 93%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 30797 · locator unknown

H.R.7567 includes Section 10205 on pesticide labeling uniformity and liability limits, Section 10206 on local pesticide regulation preemption, and Section 10207 on lawful use of registered pesticides.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The House farm bill text still contains the pesticide-label uniformity, liability, and local-preemption provisions the promise sought to remove.

unresolved same_term

H.R. 7567 - Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 98%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 1846 · locator unknown

Congress.gov lists H.R.7567 as introduced on February 13, 2026, referred to the House Agriculture Committee, with status Introduced and no later passage action shown.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The relevant farm bill had not become law or advanced beyond introduction/referral, so the specific promised farm-bill removal had not been delivered as of the official record checked.

unresolved same_term

All Info - H.R. 7567 - Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 96%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 38117 · locator unknown

The House Appropriations committee print included Section 453, Pesticides, barring funds for guidance, regulatory action, or label changes inconsistent with EPA human-health or carcinogenicity conclusions.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The pesticide-industry rider existed in the FY2026 Interior-Environment appropriations text before later negotiations, providing context for Pingree's related effort.

partial same_term

FY26 Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Bill Text
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 93%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 38118 · locator unknown

The enacted H.R.6938 text contains standard FIFRA pesticide fee provisions but no matching Section 453 rider language barring EPA label or regulatory actions inconsistent with prior assessments.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The final enacted appropriations law appears to have omitted the pesticide rider, showing a related but non-farm-bill win.

partial same_term A for effort

Text - H.R.6938 - Commerce, Justice, Science; Energy and Water Development; and Interior and Environment Appropriations Act, 2026
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 90%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 38119 · locator unknown

Congress.gov shows H.R.6938 passed the House on January 8, 2026, passed the Senate on January 15, and became Public Law No. 119-74 on January 23, 2026.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The appropriations vehicle where the similar pesticide rider was reportedly removed became law, but it was not the Farm Bill named in the promise.

partial same_term A for effort

All Info - H.R.6938 - Commerce, Justice, Science; Energy and Water Development; and Interior and Environment Appropriations Act, 2026
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 92%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 38120 · locator unknown

The House roll call for H.R.6938 shows the bill passed 397-28 and lists Rep. Chellie Pingree of Maine voting Yea.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Pingree voted for the enacted appropriations package after the related pesticide rider was no longer present, supporting an effort badge for related action.

partial same_term A for effort

House Roll Call Vote 7, 119th Congress, 2nd Session
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 88%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 1845 · locator unknown

The Guardian reported that Pingree led the effort to remove the appropriations rider, had earlier failed in committee, and warned similar language could return in the Farm Bill.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): This supports concrete Pingree effort, while also showing the achieved removal was from an appropriations bill rather than the Farm Bill itself.

unresolved same_term A for effort

Pesticide industry ‘immunity shield’ stripped from US appropriations bill
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 82%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 55130 · locator unknown

Date: Wednesday, September 16, 2026 Time: 03:30pm Location: 318 Russell Senate Office Building Check back for live video of this hearing. ## Legislation S. ___, Agricultural Act of 2026

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): In the lookback window, the Senate Agriculture Committee still had the Agricultural Act of 2026 pending for a September 16 business meeting, so the farm-bill process remained unfinished.

unresolved same_term

Business Meeting | Senate Committee On Agriculture, Nutrition & Forestry
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 92%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 55132 · locator unknown

The committee must advance this bill, and I look forward to doing so this week.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): A September 14 Senate Agriculture Committee statement described the farm bill as still needing committee advancement during the current week.

unresolved same_term

ICYMI: Chairman Boozman Amplifies Voices of Rural America in Push to Advance Farm Bill 2.0
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 90%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 55134 · locator unknown

Sec. 10205. Construction projects to support emergency plant health response efforts. Sec. 10206. Agriculture quarantine and inspection program reserve fee. Sec. 10207. Registration review. Sec. 10208. Office of Pest Management Policy. Sec. 10209. Coordination. Sec. 10210. Multiple crop and pesticide use survey. Sec. 10211. Office of Biotechnology Policy.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The latest Senate farm-bill text in the lookback window does not list the House-reported pesticide-label uniformity, state-authority preemption, or lawful-use sections under those section numbers; this supports partial progress, but not enactment.

partial same_term

S. ___, Agricultural Act of 2026
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 86%

Contest this evidence item

verified · Source version 55136 · locator 562

S. ____, Agricultural Act of 2026, as an original bill, with amendments (Not Agreed to by Roll Call Vote: 10-11)

Fetched verbatim passage. AI summary (separate from source): The Senate committee did not report the Agricultural Act of 2026 on August 6, leaving the broader farm bill unresolved.

unresolved same_term

Business Meeting | Senate Committee On Agriculture, Nutrition & Forestry
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 93%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 55138 · locator unknown

Vote Question: On Agreeing to the Amendment Amendment Author: Luna of Florida Part B Amendment No. 28 Vote Type: Recorded Vote Status: Agreed to VOTES Aye: 280 No: 142

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The House agreed to the Luna amendment associated with stripping the pesticide provisions from H.R. 7567, a concrete partial delivery in the House version of the Farm Bill.

partial same_term

Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 94%

Contest this evidence item

verified · Source version 55139 · locator 3075

I have a lot of concerns about this bill, but I’d like to use the limited time I have to show strong support for Representative Luna’s pesticide amendment. I am proud to say that her amendment, which was made in order, mirrors the language of the bipartisan amendment I sponsored with Representative Massie

Fetched verbatim passage. AI summary (separate from source): Pingree publicly supported the floor amendment and tied it to her own bipartisan amendment, documenting concrete effort toward the promised removal.

partial same_term A for effort

‘A Handout to Big Chemical’: On House Floor, Pingree Speaks Out Against Republican Farm Bill | U.S. Representative Chellie Pingree
primary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 90%

Contest this evidence item

Assessments

Public state: pending As of 2026-09-16 · verified · . Original AI recommendation (not independently established): unresolved. same_term A for effort

The verified commitment concerns Pingree's amendment to strike pesticide liability shield sections from the Farm Bill. Verified evidence shows she sponsored a bipartisan amendment with Rep. Massie and supported a related Luna amendment, establishing material effort. But the only verified outcome evidence shows the Senate Agricultural Act of 2026 was not agreed to in committee, and there is no verified evidence that the Farm Bill removal was enacted or finally achieved as of 2026-09-16. Because the process remains unresolved rather than failed after an expired deadline, the outcome is unresolved, with an effort badge.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 90%

Public state: unverified As of unknown · legacy_unverified · . Original AI recommendation (not independently established): unresolved. unknown A for effort

As of June 18, 2026, the relevant House farm bill text still contains the pesticide-label uniformity and local-preemption provisions the promise sought to remove, and the bill had only been introduced and referred to committee rather than enacted. Pingree appears to have made a serious, related effort by helping strip similar pesticide-industry protections from an appropriations measure, but that did not yet deliver the specific promised outcome of removing those protections from the Farm Bill itself. Because she remains in office and the farm-bill process is still unfinished, this is best scored as unresolved rather than delivered or fully failed.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.4 · confidence 90%