Remove chemical company liability protections and preemption of state and local pesticide warning-label and usage rules from the Farm Bill.

Chellie Pingree · Maine · Democratic

policy impact 0.78 specificity 0.92 extraction confidence 96%

Contest this claim

Occurrences

Evidence

Pingree said she led the effort to strip pesticide preemption language from the appropriations bill and warned the issue could return in the Farm Bill.

Pingree took concrete action to remove the pesticide liability/preemption rider, but the fight was not finished and could reappear in farm-bill negotiations.

unresolved same_term A for effort

Pesticide industry ‘immunity shield’ stripped from US appropriations bill
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 78%

Contest this evidence item

Section 10205 imposes national uniformity for pesticide labeling and blocks states, localities, and courts from adding different labeling or warning requirements; Section 10206 bars local regulation of pesticide sale, distribution, labeling, application, or use.

The House farm bill text still contains the pesticide-label uniformity and preemption language the commitment sought to remove.

unresolved same_term

H.R. 7567 - Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 97%

Contest this evidence item

Congress.gov lists the bill status as Introduced, with latest House action being referral to the House Committee on Agriculture on 2026-02-13.

As of the official bill page, H.R. 7567 had not advanced beyond introduction/referral, so the requested change had not been enacted.

unresolved same_term

All Info - H.R. 7567 - Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 93%

Contest this evidence item

H.R.7567 includes Section 10205 on pesticide labeling uniformity and liability limits, Section 10206 on local pesticide regulation preemption, and Section 10207 on lawful use of registered pesticides.

The House farm bill text still contains the pesticide-label uniformity, liability, and local-preemption provisions the promise sought to remove.

unresolved same_term

H.R. 7567 - Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 98%

Contest this evidence item

Congress.gov lists H.R.7567 as introduced on February 13, 2026, referred to the House Agriculture Committee, with status Introduced and no later passage action shown.

The relevant farm bill had not become law or advanced beyond introduction/referral, so the specific promised farm-bill removal had not been delivered as of the official record checked.

unresolved same_term

All Info - H.R. 7567 - Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 96%

Contest this evidence item

The House Appropriations committee print included Section 453, Pesticides, barring funds for guidance, regulatory action, or label changes inconsistent with EPA human-health or carcinogenicity conclusions.

The pesticide-industry rider existed in the FY2026 Interior-Environment appropriations text before later negotiations, providing context for Pingree's related effort.

partial same_term

FY26 Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Bill Text
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 93%

Contest this evidence item

The enacted H.R.6938 text contains standard FIFRA pesticide fee provisions but no matching Section 453 rider language barring EPA label or regulatory actions inconsistent with prior assessments.

The final enacted appropriations law appears to have omitted the pesticide rider, showing a related but non-farm-bill win.

partial same_term A for effort

Text - H.R.6938 - Commerce, Justice, Science; Energy and Water Development; and Interior and Environment Appropriations Act, 2026
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 90%

Contest this evidence item

Congress.gov shows H.R.6938 passed the House on January 8, 2026, passed the Senate on January 15, and became Public Law No. 119-74 on January 23, 2026.

The appropriations vehicle where the similar pesticide rider was reportedly removed became law, but it was not the Farm Bill named in the promise.

partial same_term A for effort

All Info - H.R.6938 - Commerce, Justice, Science; Energy and Water Development; and Interior and Environment Appropriations Act, 2026
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 92%

Contest this evidence item

The House roll call for H.R.6938 shows the bill passed 397-28 and lists Rep. Chellie Pingree of Maine voting Yea.

Pingree voted for the enacted appropriations package after the related pesticide rider was no longer present, supporting an effort badge for related action.

partial same_term A for effort

House Roll Call Vote 7, 119th Congress, 2nd Session
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 88%

Contest this evidence item

The Guardian reported that Pingree led the effort to remove the appropriations rider, had earlier failed in committee, and warned similar language could return in the Farm Bill.

This supports concrete Pingree effort, while also showing the achieved removal was from an appropriations bill rather than the Farm Bill itself.

unresolved same_term A for effort

Pesticide industry ‘immunity shield’ stripped from US appropriations bill
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 82%

Contest this evidence item

Assessments

unresolved unknown A for effort

As of June 18, 2026, the relevant House farm bill text still contains the pesticide-label uniformity and local-preemption provisions the promise sought to remove, and the bill had only been introduced and referred to committee rather than enacted. Pingree appears to have made a serious, related effort by helping strip similar pesticide-industry protections from an appropriations measure, but that did not yet deliver the specific promised outcome of removing those protections from the Farm Bill itself. Because she remains in office and the farm-bill process is still unfinished, this is best scored as unresolved rather than delivered or fully failed.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.4 · confidence 90%