We need FEMA reform. ... We need local control. We can’t have a FEMA that is abolished or a Secretary that promotes abolishing FEMA and not providing services that our citizens and all our states need when they’re on the receiving end of a monster storm.
Support FEMA reform and local control over disaster response.
Occurrences
Evidence
Welch and Sen. Andy Kim sent a letter urging DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin to pursue meaningful FEMA reform, improve disaster response and recovery timelines, support an experienced FEMA administrator, keep FEMA adequately staffed, and reaffirm FEMA’s independence within DHS so it can make its own decisions before, during, and after disasters.
Welch’s office maintains a flooding resources page for Vermont residents, municipalities, businesses, and nonprofits. It directs people to FEMA assistance, the FEMA helpline, and the state’s Emergency Relief and Assistance Fund, alongside other recovery resources.
Assessments
Welch appears to have materially acted on the promise by officially urging DHS to pursue meaningful FEMA reform and protect FEMA’s operational independence. That is clear evidence of support for FEMA reform during his Senate term. However, the stronger part of the claim about increasing local control over disaster response is not directly established by the record provided; the evidence only indirectly suggests decentralization through FEMA independence and constituent disaster-support work. Because the available evidence shows real advocacy on reform but not clear delivery on the local-control component, the best judgment is partial rather than full delivery.