Extend meal access during summer break and sudden school closures so no child’s nutrition falls through the cracks.
Extend meal access during summer break and sudden school closures so no child's nutrition falls through the cracks.
Occurrences
Evidence
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
Congress.gov lists Pettersen as “Pettersen, Brittany [D-CO] (118th-119th).”
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
Section 502 created new summer nutrition access: rural noncongregate meals beginning summer 2023 and Summer EBT beginning summer 2024.
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
The House vote on H.R. 2617 occurred December 23, 2022, in the 117th Congress and passed 225-201.
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
USDA's interim final rule codified Summer EBT and rural noncongregate meal service, effective December 29, 2023.
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
USDA says SUN Bucks provides $120 in grocery benefits per eligible school-age child when school is out for summer.
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
USDA says kids can eat summer meals and snacks at no cost at schools, parks, and neighborhood locations.
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
USDA says rural communities may receive meals through pick-up or delivery under SUN Meals To-Go.
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
The eCFR defines unanticipated school closure periods when children may be served meals at non-school sites through SFSP.
Assessments
Major pieces of the promised outcome are now in place federally: Summer EBT/SUN Bucks, rural noncongregate summer meals, traditional summer meal sites, and rules for meals during unanticipated school closures. However, the principal statutory expansion was enacted in December 2022 before Pettersen entered federal office, and the later USDA implementation during her House service flowed from that preexisting law rather than evidence of Pettersen writing, sponsoring, voting for, or materially advancing the policy. Because the policy outcome exists but candidate-specific credit is weak, partial credit is more appropriate than full delivery.