Rep. Lauren Boebert announced the introduction of the Local Data for Better Conservation Act, ... The legislation amends the Endangered Species Act (ESA) to require federal officials to accept and incorporate high-quality data collected by state wildlife agencies when making listing and delisting determinations for endangered and threatened species.
Will require federal officials to accept and incorporate high-quality data collected by state wildlife agencies when making Endangered Species Act listing and delisting determinations.
Occurrences
Evidence
The committee said Bruce Westerman introduced the ESA Amendments Act of 2025. The bill would let states develop and submit recovery strategies and move species toward state management before delisting, which is related to the claim but not the specific data-acceptance mandate.
Current ESA section 4 text says listing and delisting determinations are made solely on the basis of the best scientific and commercial data available, while also taking state protection efforts and state-agency identifications into account.
Section 6 requires the Secretary to cooperate with states and allows cooperative agreements in which state agencies provide plans, details, information, and data to the Secretary.
Section 7 requires federal agencies to consult with affected states where appropriate and to use the best scientific and commercial data available when judging whether actions jeopardize listed species or critical habitat.
Assessments
The promise has not been fully delivered. The evidence shows related same-term congressional activity to expand state involvement in Endangered Species Act decisions, but not enactment of the specific rule that federal officials must accept and incorporate high-quality state wildlife-agency data in listing and delisting determinations. The current ESA already requires use of the best available data and some consultation or cooperation with states, which is meaningfully related but still falls short of the promised mandate. The record provided also does not show Boebert herself wrote, sponsored, or materially advanced the exact requirement, so this is better scored as partial progress rather than full delivery.