Support legislation to modernize reciprocal deposit rules by replacing the current cap with tiered thresholds for non-brokered treatment and allowing well-capitalized CAMELS 3-rated banks to fully use non-brokered treatment for reciprocal deposits.

Mike Rounds · South Dakota · Republican

policy impact 0.55 specificity 0.82 extraction confidence 86%

Contest this claim

Occurrences

By tailoring the rules, this legislation removes the outdated cap on reciprocal deposits for community banks. That flexibility will help South Dakota banks keep deposits local and strengthens the resilience of our financial system. Under the bill, reciprocal deposits would be eligible for non-brokered status based on tiered liability thresholds, and CAMELS 3-rated banks would be eligible for full use of non-brokered treatment as long as they are well-capitalized.

Rounds introduced and promoted the Keeping Deposits Local Act, which would change reciprocal deposit rules for community and regional banks by replacing the current cap with tiered thresholds and expanding non-brokered treatment eligibility.

Rounds, Warner Introduce Legislation to ... | U.S. Senator Mike Rounds
secondary · other · model gpt-5.5

Evidence

Congress.gov lists Sen. Mike Rounds [R-SD] as an original cosponsor of S.2155 on 11/16/2017.

Rounds clearly supported a reciprocal-deposit modernization bill by original cosponsorship, but this was the 2018 limited-exception framework rather than the later claimed tiered-threshold/CAMELS-3 replacement.

partial unknown A for effort

Cosponsors - S.2155 - 115th Congress: Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 92%

Contest this evidence item

The Senate vote page says S.2155 passed 67-31 on March 14, 2018, and lists Rounds (R-SD) as Yea.

Rounds voted for final Senate passage of the 2018 bill containing a reciprocal-deposit exception, showing concrete support, but not enactment of the specific tiered-threshold and CAMELS-3 policy in the claim.

partial unknown A for effort

U.S. Senate Roll Call Vote 115th Congress, 2nd Session, Vote 54
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 93%

Contest this evidence item

Section 202 created a limited exception for reciprocal deposits, excluding them from brokered-deposit treatment only up to the lesser of $5,000,000,000 or 20 percent of total liabilities, and only for institutions meeting specified capital and examination conditions.

The enacted law modernized reciprocal deposits but retained a single cap formula and did not replace it with tiered thresholds or broaden full non-brokered treatment to well-capitalized CAMELS-3 banks.

partial unknown A for effort

Public Law 115-174, Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 94%

Contest this evidence item

The U.S. Code provision for reciprocal deposits still says the exception applies only up to the lesser of $5,000,000,000 or 20 percent of total liabilities, and defines an agent institution by reference to an examination finding of outstanding or good plus well-capitalized status, waiver, or a grandfathering limit.

Current statutory text, as published by the House Office of Law Revision Counsel, shows the claimed replacement with tiered thresholds and full CAMELS-3 access had not been enacted in the statute available in 2025.

never unknown

12 U.S.C. 1831f: Brokered Deposits
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 90%

Contest this evidence item

The eCFR page, displayed as up to date as of 6/26/2026, keeps the reciprocal-deposit exception at the lesser of $5,000,000,000 or 20 percent of total liabilities and requires a composite condition of outstanding or good plus well-capitalized status unless a waiver or grandfathering condition applies.

As of the latest available pre-July 1, 2026 regulation text, the existing cap and outstanding/good examination-condition framework remained in place; the specific promised tiered-threshold/CAMELS-3 change was not implemented.

never same_term

eCFR: 12 CFR 337.6 - Brokered Deposits
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 93%

Contest this evidence item

Congress.gov states S.2155 became Public Law No. 115-174 on 05/24/2018. The CRS summary says Section 202 excludes reciprocal deposits from brokered-deposit limitations if total reciprocal deposits do not exceed the lesser of $5 billion or 20% of total liabilities.

The reciprocal-deposit portion Rounds supported did become law, but Congress.gov describes the enacted policy as the same limited cap-based exception, not the specific tiered-threshold and CAMELS-3 modernization in the claim.

partial unknown A for effort

S.2155 - Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 92%

Contest this evidence item

Assessments

partial same_term A for effort

Rounds materially supported reciprocal-deposit modernization during his federal Senate service by originally cosponsoring S.2155 and voting for final passage, and that bill became Public Law 115-174 on May 24, 2018. However, the enacted law created only a limited reciprocal-deposit exception capped at the lesser of $5 billion or 20 percent of liabilities and retained the outstanding/good examination-condition framework; it did not replace the cap with tiered thresholds or give well-capitalized CAMELS 3-rated banks full non-brokered treatment. Because a related modernization was enacted with Rounds's support but the specific promised policy was not delivered, this merits partial credit with an effort badge.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 92%