I will support preserving the Senate filibuster and its 60-vote threshold for passing legislation.

John R. Curtis · Utah · Republican

policy impact 0.45 specificity 0.78 extraction confidence 86%

Contest this claim

Occurrences

Evidence

Rule XXII provides that cloture on most pending Senate business is invoked by "three-fifths of the Senators duly chosen and sworn," with a higher threshold for rules changes.

The official Senate rules still contain the three-fifths cloture threshold that underpins the legislative filibuster and 60-vote requirement.

delivered unknown

Standing Rules of the Senate, Rule XXII
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 92%

Contest this evidence item

For cloture on H.R. 1968, the Senate listed "Required For Majority: 3/5" and "Vote Result: Cloture Motion Agreed to" with 62 yeas; Curtis voted yea.

During Curtis's Senate term, a legislative cloture vote was governed by the 3/5 threshold, and Curtis participated under that preserved rule.

delivered same_term

U.S. Senate Roll Call Vote 128, 119th Congress, 1st Session
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 90%

Contest this evidence item

For cloture on the motion to proceed to H.R. 5371, the Senate listed "Required For Majority: 3/5" and "Vote Result: Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected" despite 54 yeas; Curtis voted yea.

The legislative filibuster threshold was enforced during the 2025 funding fight: 54 votes were insufficient, showing the 60-vote rule remained intact during Curtis's term.

delivered same_term

U.S. Senate Roll Call Vote 581, 119th Congress, 1st Session
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 91%

Contest this evidence item

AP reported Curtis said: "The filibuster forces us to find common ground in the Senate" and "I'm a firm no on eliminating it."

When President Trump pressed Republicans to remove the legislative filibuster during the shutdown, Curtis publicly opposed eliminating it.

delivered same_term

What's the filibuster and why does Trump want to get rid of it during the shutdown?
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 88%

Contest this evidence item

The Guardian reported that Curtis rejected Trump's suggestion and reaffirmed opposition to ending the rule requiring 60 votes to advance legislation.

Independent reporting corroborates that Curtis opposed eliminating the 60-vote legislative filibuster during his Senate term.

delivered same_term

Trump calls on Republicans to abolish the Senate filibuster rule
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 86%

Contest this evidence item

AP reported that most Senate Republicans did not want to lower the 60-vote threshold and quoted Curtis on a proposed workaround: "the reason or method doesn't matter - it's breaking the filibuster."

Curtis opposed a talking-filibuster maneuver to push the SAVE Act around Democratic opposition, treating it as breaking the filibuster.

delivered same_term

Republican voter ID bill stalls in Senate despite Trump demands
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 84%

Contest this evidence item

Assessments

delivered same_term

Curtis promised to support preserving the Senate legislative filibuster and its 60-vote threshold. During his Senate term, the 3/5 cloture threshold remained in force and was applied in legislative votes, including votes where 54 yeas failed and 62 yeas succeeded. Curtis also publicly opposed eliminating or bypassing the filibuster when pressured by President Trump, directly aligning with the promise. Because the rule remained intact and Curtis supported preserving it during the same federal Senate term, this counts as delivered.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 90%