If the administration won’t enforce the law, Congress must hold them accountable through oversight and cutting funding in other areas to make the administration understand that Congress is an equal branch of the government and that the laws must be upheld.
Use congressional oversight and funding cuts to hold an administration accountable if it does not enforce immigration laws.
Occurrences
Evidence
In CPR's 2024 candidate questionnaire, Crank said Congress should enforce border security and, if an administration would not enforce immigration law, use oversight and funding cuts to hold it accountable.
The Clerk records Roll Call 23 on S. 5, Laken Riley Act: vote question on passage, status passed, 263 yeas to 156 nays. The member list shows Crank, Republican, Colorado, voting Yea.
Congress.gov states S. 5 became Public Law 119-1 on January 29, 2025. The text requires DHS detainers and custody for covered aliens and gives state attorneys general standing to sue federal officials over specified detention, release, bond, parole, and removal decisions.
Congress.gov lists H.R. 32 as introduced and referred to the House Judiciary Committee. CRS summarizes that it would make certain noncooperating jurisdictions ineligible for federal funds and require DHS annual reports to congressional committees.
The H.R. 32 cosponsor page lists 21 Republican cosponsors through August 15, 2025; Colorado is not listed among cosponsor states, and Jeff Crank is not listed among the cosponsors.
Crank's official press-release index says he voted for the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2026, describing it as providing resources to protect the homeland and keep communities safe, secure, and resilient.
Assessments
Crank made the promise as a 2024 federal House candidate and, in his first House term, voted for final passage of the Laken Riley Act, which became Public Law 119-1 and strengthened immigration detention and accountability mechanisms. That is a concrete same-term action related to enforcing immigration law. However, the promised mechanism was specifically congressional oversight and funding cuts to hold an administration accountable; the record provided does not show Crank sponsoring or materially advancing a funding-cut or oversight measure against an administration, and he was not listed as a cosponsor of H.R. 32. A DHS appropriations vote supplied enforcement resources rather than cutting funding to compel compliance. This supports partial credit, not full delivery.