If we're going to export advanced AI chips, we need confidence that they don’t end up in the hands of the Chinese military. We’re continuously seeing examples of Chinese espionage, theft, and diversion over and over again. We can’t allow this to keep happening
I will work to prevent exported advanced AI chips from ending up in the hands of the Chinese military or other foreign adversaries.
Occurrences
Evidence
BIS imposed export controls on advanced computing semiconductor chips, supercomputer end uses, and certain China-linked Entity List transactions. The rule states these systems are used by the PRC for military modernization and that BIS intended to limit the PRC's ability to obtain advanced computing chips or develop AI and supercomputer capabilities contrary to U.S. national security interests.
The rule created license requirements for exports, reexports, and in-country transfers of identified advanced computing items to or within the PRC, citing historical diversion of PRC-designed chips to support PRC military modernization and the inherent risk of diversion with advanced computing chips.
Axios reported that House Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Brian Mast's AI Overwatch Act would require the administration to notify lawmakers before exporting AI chips to China and other adversaries, and would give Congress power to block those exports.
Axios reported that the House Foreign Affairs Committee voted 42-2, with one present, to advance Chair Brian Mast's AI Overwatch Act. The bill would give Congress power to block the Trump administration from exporting AI chips to adversaries and had been introduced by Mast in December.
The report says the AI Overwatch Act would subject higher-performance AI processor exports to Department of Commerce controls plus congressional review, terminate existing licenses, impose a temporary denial period, and allow Congress to block sales such as Nvidia H200 or AMD MI325X exports to Chinese customers.
The report says Commerce rules permitted limited exports of Nvidia H200, AMD MI325X, and comparable processors to China and Macau on a case-by-case basis, while requiring testing, end-user disclosures, know-your-customer controls, and limits barring restricted parties such as Chinese military or intelligence agencies.
Axios reported a new AI chip smuggling case involving alleged diversion of $2.5 billion worth of servers with Nvidia AI chips to China. Mast told Axios that H200s, Blackwells, or any AI chips that could help China win the AI arms race can never have Chinese end users.
AP reported that three people affiliated with Super Micro Computer were charged with conspiring to illegally export high-performance servers containing advanced Nvidia chips to China from 2024 to 2025. The indictment alleged $2.5 billion in orders and at least $510 million worth of servers diverted to China.
The report says House Select Committee on China Chair John Moolenaar and House Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Brian Mast led a letter urging State and Commerce to press allies for countrywide controls on key semiconductor manufacturing equipment and subcomponents that China cannot produce indigenously.
Assessments
Mast took concrete same-term action toward the promise by introducing and advancing the AI Overwatch Act through the House Foreign Affairs Committee and joining related pressure for tighter allied semiconductor controls. Existing federal export controls also address advanced AI chips and PRC military diversion risks. However, the Mast-backed bill had not been enacted, U.S. policy still allowed some controlled AI-chip exports to China, and alleged 2024-2025 smuggling/diversion cases show the promised prevention outcome was not fully achieved. This supports partial credit with an effort badge, not full delivery.