The Veterans Flight Training Responsibility Act will cap flight training fees for veteran students at $108,480 for public flight training institutions and allow student veterans to use their GI Bill throughout the whole year... "This is a great first step, and we’ll keep working to get them signed into law."
Keep working to enact legislation capping flight training fees for veteran students and allowing veterans to use GI Bill benefits throughout the whole year for flight training.
Occurrences
Evidence
For flight training, the statute provides payment of the lesser of actual net tuition and fees or a capped amount: $10,000 for the academic year beginning August 1, 2011, increased in subsequent academic years.
VA lists current rates for August 1, 2025, to July 31, 2026, and says flight training for a non-degree certificate or rating program is covered up to $17,097.67.
VA says eligible veterans may use Post-9/11 GI Bill, Montgomery GI Bill Active Duty, or Montgomery GI Bill Selected Reserve benefits for approved FAA-certified flight training; for Post-9/11 GI Bill, VA pays approved fees up to the maximum cap.
The amendment notes state that Pub. L. 111-377 added subsection (g) in 2011 and that the amendments generally took effect August 1, 2011. The 2023 amendment listed on the page concerns subsection (l)(1), not the flight-training cap.
Congress.gov identifies Morgan McGarvey as House Kentucky, District 3, serving in the 118th-119th Congresses from 2023 to present, with member activity categories including sponsored legislation, cosponsored legislation, remarks, and roll-call votes.
Assessments
Veterans can currently use GI Bill benefits for approved flight training, and federal law includes an indexed annual cap for non-degree flight training. But the cap framework predates Morgan McGarvey's House service, and the supplied record does not show that he enacted, sponsored, or materially advanced new legislation capping flight training fees or allowing year-round GI Bill use for flight training. Because part of the substantive policy condition exists but is not attributable to McGarvey and the year-round-use change is not shown as delivered, this merits partial credit rather than full delivery.