Advance the Accessible Voting Act to expand voting access for older Americans, people with disabilities, Native Americans, Alaska Natives, Indigenous peoples, and language-minority voters by improving accessible registration, absentee voting, in-person voting, voter information, training, and grant support.

Jamie Raskin · Maryland · Democratic

policy impact 0.80 specificity 0.83 extraction confidence 88%

Commitment kind: unknown. Promised action: not established. Promised outcome: not established. Deadline: unknown; not assumed expired.

Contest this claim

Occurrences

“I’m proud our legislation will address these systemic deficiencies so we can make sure everyone is able to vote regardless of a disability, where you live, or what language you speak.”

Raskin committed through the Accessible Voting Act to address systemic voting-access barriers and make voting accessible regardless of disability, location, or language.

Scanlon, Raskin Introduce Accessible Voting Act to Expand Voting Rights for Older Americans, People With Disabilities | Press Releases | Congressman Jamie Raskin
secondary · other · model gpt-5.5

Evidence

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

The House amendment was titled the Freedom to Vote: John R. Lewis Act and included voter-access divisions covering registration, disability and older-voter access, vote by mail, HAVA funding support, poll-worker training grants, and a Native American Voting Rights Act subtitle with task-force grants, accessible Tribal polling sites, language-assistance provisions, and protections for American Indian and Alaska Native voters.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): This bill text closely matches the promise’s substance: accessible registration, absentee/mail voting, in-person voting protections, voter information, training, grants, Native/Alaska Native voting access, and language assistance. It was a concrete legislative vehicle, but bill text alone does not show enactment.

partial unknown

GovInfo - H.R. 5746 Engrossed Amendment House, Freedom to Vote: John R. Lewis Act
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 92%

Contest this evidence item

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

The House Clerk records H.R. 5746 as passing on the motion to concur with an amendment, 220-203, and lists Rep. Raskin of Maryland voting Yea.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Raskin took a concrete floor vote to advance the voting-access package that contained disability, older-voter, Native/Alaska Native, language-access, training, and grant provisions. This supports effort/advancement, not final delivery.

partial unknown A for effort

Office of the Clerk, U.S. House - Roll Call 9 on H.R. 5746
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 95%

Contest this evidence item

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

The Senate vote on cloture for the motion to concur in the House amendment to H.R. 5746 required three-fifths support; the result was rejected, 49 yeas to 51 nays.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The voting-access package Raskin supported did not clear the Senate cloture hurdle and therefore was not enacted through this route. This is evidence of failed delivery despite clear House-side effort.

never unknown A for effort

U.S. Senate Roll Call Vote 117th Congress, 2nd Session, Vote 9
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 94%

Contest this evidence item

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

H.R. 1 included election-access provisions for online and automatic registration, HAVA payments, access to voting for individuals with disabilities, grants to assure disability voting access, early voting, voting by mail, poll-worker recruitment and training grants, Indian-land accommodations, voter information response systems, drop boxes, and curbside voting.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Earlier in the same Congress, the For the People Act contained several accessibility provisions aligned with the promise. This shows the policy was advanced through another major voting-rights vehicle, but the introduced text itself was not enactment.

partial unknown

GovInfo - H.R. 1 Introduced in House, For the People Act of 2021
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 88%

Contest this evidence item

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

The House Clerk records H.R. 1, the For the People Act, as passing 220-210 and lists Rep. Raskin of Maryland voting Yea.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Raskin voted to advance a broad voting-access bill with disability access, registration, mail-voting, Indian-land accommodation, voter-information, and training-grant provisions. This is concrete effort, but not final enactment.

partial unknown A for effort

Office of the Clerk, U.S. House - Roll Call 62 on H.R. 1
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 94%

Contest this evidence item

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

Congress.gov lists H.R. 1 as introduced by Rep. John Sarbanes, passed by the House on March 3, 2021, and received in the Senate on March 11, 2021; its status is Passed House, not law.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Official bill status confirms H.R. 1 advanced through the House but did not become enacted law. This supports partial advancement rather than fulfillment.

partial unknown A for effort

Congress.gov - H.R. 1, For the People Act of 2021
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 90%

Contest this evidence item

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

The Senate vote on cloture for proceeding to S. 2093, the For the People Act of 2021, required three-fifths support; cloture was rejected, 50 yeas to 50 nays.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The Senate blocked the companion For the People Act effort, so the accessibility and voting-access provisions were not enacted through that bill. This weighs against full delivery while preserving evidence of effort.

never unknown A for effort

U.S. Senate Roll Call Vote 117th Congress, 1st Session, Vote 246
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 91%

Contest this evidence item

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

GovInfo lists H.R. 7389 as the Accessible Voting Act of 2024; the last listed action says Scanlon, Dean, and Raskin introduced the bill and it was referred to the House Committee on House Administration. The bill version is Introduced in House.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): No new delivery signal was found in the 2026-08-31 to 2026-09-02 lookback. The latest official House vehicle matching the promise shows Raskin took concrete action by helping introduce/cosponsor H.R. 7389, but the official record shows only introduction and referral, not enactment.

partial later_term A for effort

GovInfo - H.R. 7389 (IH), Accessible Voting Act of 2024
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 94%

Contest this evidence item

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

The bill text states the purpose is to improve access for older individuals, individuals with disabilities, Native Americans, Alaska Natives, and limited-English-proficiency voters to register and cast ballots. Its table of contents includes accessible election websites, absentee voting access, in-person voting protections, payments to states, a national resource center, and grants.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The introduced text closely matches the commitment's promised policy substance, but because it is introduced bill text rather than enacted public law, it supports effort/partial advancement rather than fulfilled delivery.

partial later_term A for effort

GovInfo - Text of H.R. 7389 (IH), Accessible Voting Act of 2024
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 93%

Contest this evidence item

Assessments

Public state: unverified As of unknown · legacy_unverified · . Original AI recommendation (not independently established): never. unknown A for effort

Raskin materially advanced the policy by voting for broad voting-access bills and helping introduce H.R. 7389, the Accessible Voting Act of 2024, whose text closely matched the promised accessibility, Native/Alaska Native, language-access, training, and grant provisions. But the official record shows the Accessible Voting Act only reached introduction/referral, and earlier voting-access vehicles passed the House but failed in the Senate. Because the promised substantive voting-access expansion was not enacted or otherwise delivered, this is a failed delivery with clear legislative effort.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 94%

Public state: unverified As of unknown · legacy_unverified · . Original AI recommendation (not independently established): never. unknown A for effort

Raskin made concrete House-side efforts to advance voting-access legislation matching the promise, including voting for H.R. 1 and the Freedom to Vote: John R. Lewis Act package in H.R. 5746. Those bills included disability access, older-voter access, registration, mail/absentee voting, Native and Alaska Native voting provisions, language assistance, training, and grant support. However, the relevant federal legislation did not become law after Senate cloture failed, so the promised voting-access expansion was not delivered.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 94%