Fully close the boyfriend loophole in gun laws.

Katherine M. Clark · Massachusetts · Democratic

policy impact 0.65 specificity 0.85 extraction confidence 96%

Contest this claim

Occurrences

Evidence

Section 12005 amended 18 U.S.C. 921(a)(33)(A)(ii) to include a misdemeanor domestic-violence offense committed by a person with a current or recent former dating relationship with the victim.

Congress enacted a federal change covering dating partners for misdemeanor domestic-violence convictions, addressing a major part of the boyfriend loophole.

partial unknown

Public Law 117-159, Bipartisan Safer Communities Act
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 96%

Contest this evidence item

The same section says the amendments do not apply to convictions entered before enactment, and allows restoration for a single dating-relationship misdemeanor domestic-violence conviction after 5 years if no later disqualifying offense occurs.

The enacted law was not a full closure: it is prospective and includes a five-year restoration rule for one qualifying dating-relationship conviction.

partial unknown

Public Law 117-159, Bipartisan Safer Communities Act
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 94%

Contest this evidence item

The current definition of misdemeanor crime of domestic violence includes offenses committed by a person who has a current or recent former dating relationship with the victim; the dating-relationship provision includes the 5-year limitation for a single conviction.

Current codified law confirms the dating-partner conviction coverage exists, but with the statutory limitation that prevents treating it as a complete fulfillment of 'fully close.'

partial unknown

18 U.S.C. 921, United States Code 2024 Edition
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 94%

Contest this evidence item

18 U.S.C. 922(g)(8) still applies to persons subject to qualifying court orders restraining conduct toward an intimate partner or child of such intimate partner or person.

The restraining-order firearm prohibition remains keyed to 'intimate partner,' not the newer 'dating relationship' definition.

never unknown

18 U.S.C. 922, United States Code 2024 Edition
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 91%

Contest this evidence item

18 U.S.C. 921(a)(32) defines intimate partner as a spouse, former spouse, co-parent, or cohabitant/former cohabitant; dating partners are added separately only for misdemeanor domestic-violence convictions.

Because the protective-order provision uses the narrower intimate-partner definition, dating partners subject only to qualifying restraining orders are still not fully covered federally.

never unknown

18 U.S.C. 921, United States Code 2024 Edition
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 90%

Contest this evidence item

Roll Call 299 on S. 2938 passed 234-193. The vote table lists Clark (MA), Democratic, Massachusetts, voting Yea.

Katherine Clark voted for the enacted Bipartisan Safer Communities Act that partially closed the boyfriend loophole.

partial unknown A for effort

Office of the Clerk, U.S. House Roll Call 299, S. 2938
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 98%

Contest this evidence item

Congress.gov summarizes H.R.1494 as prohibiting dating partners convicted of misdemeanor domestic violence or subject to certain restraining orders from receiving, possessing, shipping, or transporting firearms; the tracker status is Introduced, with latest House subcommittee referral on 2021-05-18.

A more complete bill that would have covered dating partners under both conviction and restraining-order routes did not become law in the 117th Congress.

never unknown

H.R.1494 - Zero Tolerance for Domestic Abusers Act, Congress.gov
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 92%

Contest this evidence item

Congress.gov lists H.R.1620 as Passed House on 2021-03-17 by 244-172 and later referred in the Senate Judiciary Committee on 2022-05-24; the summary says the bill made changes to federal firearms laws.

The House advanced broader VAWA-related firearm-law changes, but that House-passed vehicle did not itself become the enacted route for fully closing the loophole.

partial unknown A for effort

H.R.1620 - Violence Against Women Act Reauthorization Act of 2021, Congress.gov
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 78%

Contest this evidence item

Assessments

partial same_term A for effort

Federal law was changed in 2022 to cover current or recent former dating partners for misdemeanor domestic-violence convictions, and Clark voted for the enacted Bipartisan Safer Communities Act. But the promise was to fully close the loophole, and the enacted law remains limited: it is prospective, has a five-year restoration rule for a single qualifying dating-relationship conviction, and the protective-order firearm prohibition still uses the narrower intimate-partner definition rather than fully covering dating partners. A broader approach that would have covered restraining orders did not become law. This supports partial delivery, not full fulfillment.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 93%