introduced the Accelerating Forest Management Act, legislation to codify the Bureau of Land Management’s proposed National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) categorical exclusion for timber salvage projects in order to speed up active forest management, reduce wildfire risk, and support rural economies.
Codify the Bureau of Land Management's proposed NEPA categorical exclusion for timber salvage projects to speed up forest management and reduce wildfire risk.
Occurrences
introduced the Accelerating Forest Management Act to codify the Bureau of Land Management’s proposed NEPA categorical exclusion for timber salvage projects
To codify the categorical exclusion proposed in the National Environmental Policy Act Implementing Procedures for the Bureau of Land Management related to salvage harvesting published on April 6, 2026, and for other purposes.
Downing Introduces the Accelerating Forest Management Act
Evidence
“Today, Congressman Troy Downing introduced the Accelerating Forest Management Act, legislation to codify the Bureau of Land Management’s proposed National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) categorical exclusion for timber salvage projects in order to speed up active forest management, reduce wildfire risk, and support rural economies.”
The Natural Resources issue page repeats that Downing introduced the Accelerating Forest Management Act on May 7, 2026, describing it as legislation to codify the BLM’s proposed NEPA categorical exclusion for timber salvage projects.
“The Bureau of Land Management is proposing two new categorical exclusions under the National Environmental Policy Act to speed up reviews for timber salvage and thinning projects on public lands.” The notice says comments would be accepted until May 6, 2026.
Assessments
The claim promised codifying the BLM's proposed NEPA categorical exclusion for timber salvage projects. Evidence shows Downing directly acted on this promise by introducing the Accelerating Forest Management Act on May 7, 2026, and publicly promoting it. However, there is no evidence that the bill was enacted or that the proposal was actually codified. The BLM action cited was still only a proposed categorical exclusion during the comment period, not a completed codification. Under the rubric, a serious legislative attempt that did not achieve the promised outcome is scored as never, with effort_badge true.